“Slaughterhouse Five” and “How To
Tell A True War Story” are both written by war veterans Kurt Vonnegut and Tim
O’ Brien. Both of the authors portrayed
their stories so effectively and realistically that even the fictionalized
parts reflected the truthfulness of the reality they both experienced during the war. Both Vonnegut and O’Brien have an impression of
genuineness that comes from having lived what they write. The authors
intentionally present their plots as truth-based. In the chapters of “Slaughterhouse Five,”
Kurt Vonnegut states “All this happened, more or less.” Correspondingly,
O’Brien constantly tries to exemplify each story with its backgrounds, for
example when he says that all war stories are true but not any war stories have
morals and if they do then those war stories are not true. Both authors write
truthfully, and flashbacks constantly on their past experiences to make their
war stories portray reality in someway. Both
the writers have the essential knowledge to be able to simplify, abbreviate, or
exaggerate certain events. “Slaughterhouse Five” and “How To Tell A True War
Story” served many different reflections toward the genre of anti-war
literature. In “Slaughterhouse Five” the actions were enhanced, exhibiting the horrifying
realities of war on a grander scale, then the mystic illusions of characters
such as Billy Pilgrim show the harmful effects of war on the human mind. Moreover,
in “How to Tell A True War Story,” O’Brien constantly replays the memory
of Lemon’s death which showed the post-traumatic stress disorder that many war
soldiers suffers from. The two stories are truly very similar to each other and
convey a substantial argument of the horrors of war by truthfulness and portraying
how individuals respond to it. Both contexts
of the stories, shows the behavior of individuals at war, and how these stories
effectively send their anti-war sayings to the humankind.
The way “Slaughterhouse Five” and “How to Tell a True War Story” are told by Vonnegut and O’Brien are very similar. I like how you point out that both of them say that their story is true but at the same time take its credibility away by saying “All this happened more or less,” or that all war stories are true, but no war stories are true. It doesn't give us much insight into what is true and what is not in the story. But that also gives it a sense of authenticity since our mind is not reliable for holding memories.
ReplyDelete